If you are evaluating a voxeljet sand 3D printer, you are probably looking at a VX1000, VX2000, or VX4000 \u2014 and a quotation that starts at \u20ac450,000 and climbs past \u20ac1.2 million for the large-format systems. You are also looking at a 6\u20139 month delivery window, proprietary binder contracts, and a service network that, post-ExOne merger, is stretched thin.<\/p>\n
This article is for foundry owners and plant managers who want a voxeljet alternative<\/strong> \u2014 a sand 3D printer that delivers comparable build volume, accuracy, and throughput, but at a lower total cost of ownership, with faster delivery, and without binder lock-in. We compare the alternatives on the metrics that actually decide the purchase: build volume, print speed, accuracy, binder system, price, lead time, and 5-year TCO.<\/p>\n The short version: 3DPTEK<\/strong> (Beijing SANDI Technology) is the most direct voxeljet alternative for sand casting \u2014 same BJ binder jetting technology, comparable build volumes up to 4,000\u00d72,000\u00d71,000 mm, open material systems, and a 40% lower TCO validated in production foundries. But it is not the only option. Here is the full landscape.<\/p>\n Voxeljet makes excellent sand 3D printers. The VX-series machines are battle-tested in foundries across Europe, and the VX4000 remains one of the largest-format sand printers commercially available. But three things have changed since 2023 that push buyers to evaluate alternatives:<\/p>\n Here is the landscape of sand 3D printers that compete directly with voxeljet’s VX-series, ranked by how closely they match voxeljet’s use case (binder jetting sand for foundry casting).<\/p>\nWhy Foundries Are Looking for Voxeljet Alternatives<\/h2>\n
\n
The Voxeljet Alternative Landscape at a Glance<\/h2>\n